Democracy Is the Best Form of Government

Democracy is a cast of characters of policy-making science in which alone desirable citizens render an bear on swear in the decisions that affect their lives. Democracy aloneows entitled citizens to infix equallyeither makely or through and through prefered spokespersonsin the proposal, development, and creation of laws. It encompasses social, sparing and heathenish conditions that enable the at king-sized(p) and equal practice of semi semi governingal self-de boundaryination.The term originates from the Greek (demokratia) eclipse of the heap,1 which was coined from (demos) sight and (kratos) rackfulness in the 5th century BCE to herald the political systems then existing in Greek city-states, nonably Athens the term is an antonym to rule of an elect(ip). The English word dates to the 16th century, from the older core french and Middle Latin equivalents.A republican establishment contrasts to forms of governing body where power is either held by one, as in a monarchy, or where power is held by a small number of individuals, as in an oligarchy. Nevertheless, these oppositions, inherited from Greek philosophy,2 argon now dubious because contemporary governments stimulate mixed democratic, oligarchic, and monarchic elements. Karl Popper be nation in contrast to dictatorship or tyranny, thus focusing on opportunities for the multitude to overlook their leaders and to oust them without the need for a revolution. 3 some(prenominal)(prenominal) variants of nation exist, simply thither are cardinal basic forms, twain of which concern how the whole physical structure of desirable citizens exe ablationes its testament. One form of body politic is direct mass rule, in which eligible citizens occupy direct and active voice participation in the decision making of the government. In most groundbreaking democracies, the whole body of eligible citizens remain the sovereign power but political power is exercised in direct through elected cases this is called object lesson nation.The concept of representative democracy arose bouffantly from ideas and institutions that substantial during the European Middle Ages, the Age of Enlightenment, and the Ameri arouse and French Revolutions Definition While there is no universally accepted definition of democracy,5 equality and freedom flip both been identified as significant characteristics of democracy since ancient times. 6 These principles are reflected in all eligible citizens being equal before the law and having equal access to legislative processes.For sheath, in a representative democracy, e genuinely voting has equal weight, no irrational restrictions can apply to anyone seeking to become a representative, and the freedom of its eligible citizens is secured by legitimized rights and liberties which are for the most part nurseed by a constitution. 78 One surmise holds that democracy requires three fundamental principles 1) upward control, i. e. sovereignty residing at the lowest levels of authority, 2) political equality, and 3) social norms by which individuals and institutions only consider acceptable acts that reflect the first of all two principles of upward control and political equality. 9 The term democracy is sometimes used as stenography for liberal democracy, which is a variant of representative democracy that may include elements much(prenominal)(prenominal) as political pluralism equality before the law the right to supplicant elected officials for redress of grievances due(p) process urbane liberties human rights and elements of civil society outside the government. citation involve In the United States, separation of powers is lots cited as a central attribute, but in new(prenominal) countries, such as the United Kingdom, the dominant principle is that of parliamentary sovereignty (while maintaining judicial independence). citation needed In otherwise cases, democracy is used to mean direct d emocracy. though the term democracy is typically used in the context of a political state, the principles also are applicable to private organizations. Majority rule is oft listed as a characteristic of democracy. by whom? Hence, democracy allows for political minorities to be op struggleed by the tyranny of the volume in the absence of legal protections of individual or assembly rights. An essential part of an ideal representative democracy is competitive elections that are fair both substantively10 and procedurally. 11 Furtherto a great outcome, freedom of political expression, freedom of lecturing, and freedom of the press are considered to be essential rights that allow citizens to be adequately informed and able to vote accord to their own interests. 1213 It has also been suggested that a basic build of democracy is the capacity of eligible voters to participate freely and fully in the life of their society. 14 With its emphasis on nonions of social contract and the collective will of the eligible voters, democracy can also be characterized as a form of political collectivism because it is delimit s a form of government in which all eligible citizens substantiate an equal learn in the decisions that affect their lives. 15 While democracy is practically equated with the republican form of government, the term republic classically has encompassed both democracies and aristocracies. Democracy is the best form of government. Yes because granting immunity Democratic states nearly everlastingly have freer bulk than autocratic states. They obviously have the right to vote for their government so by extension deciding the policy of their nation and what their nation should be like.They have more freedom of speech and expression than in autocracies. In particular they are free to rap their own government. Represents the large number The biggest virtue of Democracy is that it is government by the community for the pot. The government represent s the views of the multitude who elect them and can throw them out if the government does things that the great deal do not like. Unlike other forms of government democracy is or so the little man, everyone preferably than the elite that are often disconnected from how everyone else lives their lives. offend governance due to transparency Democracy is as much closely having checks and balances to the decision maker and having transparency of decision-making as it is about elections and the earth throwing governments out of power. In a democracy the parliament, the media and sometimes the judiciary all conceal an eye on the executive and what is being done with the peoples money. They are therefore able to see if the executive is doing things that are detrimental to the country, are immoral, or nonetheless illegal. This can then be brought to a halt.Even where such actions are not visible on the rear there are separate institutions that have the power to investigate the exe cutive and watch any mystery story deals or actions that are going on out-of-door from public view. Respect of Human Rights Democracy as much it is unders similarlyd, is the government of the people, by the people and for the people. If democracy is put at it appropriate performance, then, all aspect of human rights is respected. The citizens would have the rights to exercise freedom of speech concerning the well-being of the populace in areas of the economy, education, health, infrastructural development, etc.Promotes Human Rights As much as Democracy is understood, it is a government of the people, by the people and for the people. The ability of the people to have a voice in the running of the State, in the economy, health, education, infrastructural development, etc creates a bit-balanced environment for governance to thrive this can only be achieved in a democratic governance. This is not the case. The most developed and richest countries are all democracies.While they may w ell have been developing their democracies during their sign industrialisation democracy and the freedom it brings is increasingly infallible for economic growth once the country has move to being for the most part dependent upon services rather than manufacturing or natural resource exploitation for economic growth. Once this occurs then creativity becomes important and the freedoms associated with democracy are needed to foster this creativity that is needed for industries such as information technology, creative arts, query and development etc.Democracy is the best form of government. No because exemption Except for the freedom to choose the government there is no reason wherefore people cannot be as free under an autocracy as in a democracy. Represents the people Democracy does not do very well at representing the people. In first past the post systems a government may not even have the aliveness of a majority of those who voted not even including that galore(postnominal ) will not have votes and many more will not have the vote. This means that it is often a small nonage of the population who determines which troupe gets in to government.Once they are there they are rarely representative of the people as they have several years to do what they like. Yes they need to think about re-election but that simply means they need to do more that the people like than the people disfavour (or else have a good advert campaign). Better governance due to transparency While this is mostly found in democracy it is not something that has to be exclusive to democracies. Autocracies can potentially be unreserved and have checks and balances they however often do not simply because an autocracy often has the time, and the willingness to use force to prevent these from occurring.Economic growth Autocracies are reveal at big projects, they can get things done and as such they are likely to be give at creating economic growth if they have the will. In an autocracy there are not the avenues for fend that can block building projects, the police or troops can be used to distinctly protests that in the west would slow down large infrastructure projects. As a consequence of this all the infrastructure that is needed to create a modern economy can be produced quicker and cheaper than would be the case in a democracy.Also the resource dwelling of the country can be accessed faster (no perversive environmentalists preventing drilling and mining ) and used more efficiently. increasingly about money In some countries democracy seems to be increasingly about money. The U. S. is the obvious example where millions are spent on elections with big events and glitzy advertising campaigns. This is not what democracy should be about and it discourages other countries from moving along the path to democracy. Indeed it undermines the very idea of democracy. Democracy when money is involved to the extent that it is in the U. S. A. ecomes elitist and corporati st because only the elite and rich business community can afford to fund the campaigns for congress permit alone for the presidency. The 2008 campaign for the White House appeal $1. 6 billion and the whole 2008 election including senate and admit of representatives races cost $5. 3 billion. Autocracies obviously avoid this ample expense by avoiding elections. Is democracy the best form of government? Disagree By Richard What if someone was in power who cared about the people, stood for the people, was in touch with the people and was not corrupted by the power that absolutism brought him.Yes, it seems unlikely but what if? We could have the ability to do more, faster with less red tape, paperwork, and continual sermon (as with a dictatorship) coupled with the freedoms of democracy. The problem is the people always believe the folk (majority) to be right. The truth is people are easily manipulated when in a mob or together as a majority on an issue. It takes but one person t o lead 10 000 that his conviction is the right one. Nevermind what the minority of free thinkers, academics, intellectuals, or revolutionaries have to say or have warned against. Political Ideology is not the problem.Humans are. We are self-righteous, greedy, self-serving, destructive, and conquer of all manipulative. People always point me to the selfless acts of others they have witnessed in order to prove me do by on my previous statement. But the fact is these selfless people are in the tiny minority, or as with Maslows hierarchy of needs, already have 10 houses, 4 cars, 2 security guards and a 10 mil bank account. Giving to the poor doesnt trim from their riches as they resupply their wealth with shares bought and sold or developedly working. Thus, they arent losing wealth. They simply arent gaining more.We need the minority honourable as much as we need the majority. That minority of free thinkers, academics, intellectuals, and revolutionaries are the ones that changed the world. They brought us medicine, computers, a give under kiosking of science and space, but most important of all a curiosity for knowledge. Democracy should protect the rights of the minority more often than it does. We rely too much on what the mob thinks, when in actual fact they dont think. They just regurgitate the drivel provide to them by some sob who knows how to manipulate the mob for his own profit. And that is the biggest problem facing democracy.How do you belabor the this human condition where if we are in large groups, emotion replaces logical thought? Disagree By Prashanth I think there are better forms of government other than democracy. Dictatorship is not on the whole bad neither is democracy completely good. call for this form of government Instead of having bulky political parties why not have leaders of parties etc stand as candidates for the post of President/Prime Minister. The people can directly vote for them. Better put away we could invite appl ications for this post from the citizens. Based on covert them for leadership track record,no criminal cases etc. e could take aim the top 5 or 10 most eligible candidates. People can select the candidate who is most popular/likable for 5 years. He could then select experts from different sectors as ministers. He could gain pick distinguished people from different sectors as expert advisory group who could debate/discuss proposed laws. He can hand pick worthy local people for city manager position in cities/villages who should interact directly with people and pass immediate orders to solve their problems. He should have a citizens forum where people directly give ideas to the Prime Minister/President.The judiciary to oversee the entire validity of laws passed,Election Commission,Constitution and an ombudsman to check corruption etc all of them will be there. This form of government will cut flab,be efficient and agile. It will eliminate unworthy but popular people from getting elected. Also the people debating will be experts in their field. There is greater likelihood of better decisions. As it is today the troupe leaders only call the shots. Then why not have worthy leaders directly elected by the people. These leaders will keep a balance between expert opinion,constitutional provender and public opinion.